Back to Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore

Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Agrochemicals & fertilizers industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Agrochemicals & fertilizers · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore FACT · you	₹48,998 Cr	139.7×	36.3×	708.1×	-2.9%	-0.7%	-2.6%
Sector median	—	25.9×	3.0×	17.0×	15.1%	6.3%	1.1%
Coromandel International COROMANDEL	₹53,359 Cr	27.3×	4.2×	17.0×	15.6%	6.2%	2.0%
UPL UPL	₹45,480 Cr	24.5×	1.4×	5.8×	5.5%	3.7%	-1.1%
PI Industries PIIND	₹43,467 Cr	32.9×	3.9×	24.2×	11.8%	19.7%	1.1%
Sumitomo Chemical India SUMICHEM	₹23,021 Cr	42.4×	6.8×	35.2×	16.0%	16.8%	-2.7%
Bayer Cropscience BAYERCROP	₹19,271 Cr	27.9×	6.5×	22.1×	23.2%	12.1%	3.4%
Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals CHAMBLFERT	₹17,743 Cr	8.8×	2.2×	—	24.9%	0.1%	—
Deepak Fertilisers & Petrochemicals Corp DEEPAKFERT	₹14,751 Cr	20.0×	2.2×	11.3×	10.8%	6.4%	0.6%
Paradeep Phosphates PARADEEP	₹13,107 Cr	12.9×	1.9×	6.6×	14.7%	4.6%	17.8%

Peer comparison verdict

Fertilizers trades at a premium to sector peers on P/E (139.7× vs median 25.9×). The market is pricing in higher growth — worth verifying whether recent revenue trends support that expectation.

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.