Back to PNGS GARGI FASHION JEWELLERY LIMITED

PNGS GARGI FASHION JEWELLERY LIMITED — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Jewellery industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Jewellery · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
PNGS GARGI FASHION JEWELLERY LIMITED GARGI · you	₹598 Cr	19.3×	4.3×	—	22.1%	21.0%	73.4%
Sector median	—	16.1×	2.8×	9.1×	15.8%	7.2%	11.1%
PCJEWELLER PCJEWELLER	₹4,317 Cr	10.5×	0.9×	8.0×	8.7%	21.3%	10.7%
Goldiam International Limited GOLDIAM	₹4,001 Cr	23.5×	3.6×	17.6×	15.4%	17.5%	22.4%
Vaibhav Global Limited VAIBHAVGBL	₹3,618 Cr	14.4×	2.3×	9.1×	16.1%	7.2%	11.1%
Shringar House of Mangalsutra Limited SHRINGARMS	₹2,157 Cr	17.8×	—	—	—	0.1%	—
Khazanchi Jewellers Limited KHAZANCHI	₹1,961 Cr	21.9×	—	—	—	—	—
Shanti Gold International Limited SHANTIGOLD	₹1,747 Cr	12.0×	3.1×	8.6×	23.4%	6.9%	43.8%
Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri Limited TBZ	₹1,677 Cr	7.9×	2.7×	—	33.9%	0.0%	—
Motisons Jewellers Limited MOTISONS	₹1,638 Cr	22.5×	2.9×	18.7×	12.8%	13.0%	10.2%

Peer comparison verdict

PNGS trades at a premium to peers (P/E 19.3× vs median 16.1×), but its higher ROE of 22.1% (sector 15.8%) justifies much of that premium — quality rarely comes cheap.

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

35% weight · 8 peers

Sector median PE16.1×

Fair value via PE₹520

25% weight · 6 peers

Sector median PB2.8×

Fair value via PB₹406

EV/EBITDA

40% weight · 5 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA9.1×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA—

Blended peer fair value₹472

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.