Grindwell Norton — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Capital Goods sector. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples. Industry-level matches were unavailable, so sector-level peers were used instead.

Peer comparison table

Capital Goods · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Grindwell Norton GRINDWELL · you	₹21,218 Cr	50.7×	8.3×	37.0×	16.4%	13.5%	6.5%
Sector median	—	37.5×	9.2×	27.6×	23.5%	7.3%	17.7%
Mazagoan Dock Shipbuilders MAZDOCK	₹98,243 Cr	37.3×	9.9×	43.4×	26.5%	19.9%	18.4%
Waaree Energies WAAREEENER	₹87,501 Cr	23.6×	6.1×	15.7×	25.7%	14.0%	57.8%
Ashok Leyland ASHOKLEY	₹84,466 Cr	24.3×	5.9×	12.6×	24.4%	6.2%	10.6%
Thermax THERMAX	₹56,509 Cr	74.1×	10.2×	52.7×	13.0%	6.7%	9.7%
Apar Industries APARINDS	₹54,642 Cr	56.0×	10.1×	29.9×	18.1%	4.3%	16.9%
KEI Industries KEI	₹50,512 Cr	55.0×	7.6×	41.1×	13.8%	7.8%	19.3%
Premier Energies PREMIERENE	₹46,126 Cr	30.8×	10.8×	22.0×	35.0%	19.3%	76.3%
APL Apollo Tubes APLAPOLLO	₹45,404 Cr	37.7×	8.6×	25.3×	22.7%	5.2%	12.6%

Peer comparison verdict

Grindwell trades at a premium to sector peers on P/E (50.7× vs median 37.5×). The market is pricing in higher growth — worth verifying whether recent revenue trends support that expectation.

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

35% weight · 8 peers

Sector median PE37.5×

Fair value via PE₹1,418

25% weight · 8 peers

Sector median PB9.2×

Fair value via PB₹2,130

EV/EBITDA

40% weight · 8 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA27.6×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA₹1,430

Blended peer fair value₹1,601

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.