Libas Consumer Products — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples. Industry-level matches were unavailable, so sector-level peers were used instead.

Peer comparison table

Fast Moving Consumer Goods · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Libas Consumer Products LIBAS · you	₹21 Cr	11.2×	0.4×	0.9×	3.2%	2.9%	2.6%
Sector median	—	17.8×	1.7×	13.6×	9.8%	0.0%	9.3%
Bambino Agro Industries Ltd BAMBINO	₹175 Cr	17.8×	1.7×	—	9.8%	0.0%	—
DSM Fresh Foods Limited ZAPPFRESH	₹160 Cr	11.2×	—	—	—	—	—
SHIVAM CHEMICALS LIMITED SHIVAM	₹160 Cr	32.1×	—	—	—	—	—
Elfin Agro India Limited ELFIN	₹158 Cr	45.3×	—	—	—	—	—
M K Proteins Limited MKPL	₹155 Cr	23.2×	2.0×	13.6×	8.9%	1.8%	6.7%
Mangalam Seeds Limited MSL	₹149 Cr	17.4×	2.0×	—	11.4%	0.1%	—
Dhunseri Tea & Industries Limited DTIL	₹143 Cr	—	0.3×	—	-0.5%	-0.5%	11.8%
Zeal Aqua Limited ZEAL	₹142 Cr	9.6×	1.7×	—	17.9%	0.0%	—

Peer comparison verdict

Libas trades at a discount to sector peers on P/E (11.2× vs median 17.8×). This may signal undervaluation — or reflect lower expected growth or higher perceived risk versus the peer group.

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.