Manorama Industries — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Fast Moving Consumer Goods industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Fast Moving Consumer Goods · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Manorama Industries MANORAMA · you	₹10,361 Cr	44.2×	14.1×	29.3×	32.0%	15.7%	57.4%
Sector median	—	25.6×	3.4×	15.6×	10.8%	4.1%	4.9%
Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care Limited PGHH	₹27,368 Cr	34.6×	35.3×	—	102.0%	0.1%	—
Hatsun Agro Product Limited HATSUN	₹25,826 Cr	60.3×	11.0×	22.5×	18.3%	3.6%	11.2%
Tilaknagar Industries Limited TI	₹14,070 Cr	-406.1×	18.6×	—	-4.6%	0.0%	—
Godrej Agrovet Limited GODREJAGRO	₹11,699 Cr	22.9×	3.4×	15.1×	14.8%	4.6%	3.0%
KRBL Limited KRBL	₹10,302 Cr	13.2×	1.5×	10.3×	11.2%	10.6%	4.4%
Kwality Wall's (India) Limited KWIL	₹8,456 Cr	—	12.9×	—	-109.7%	-16.4%	—
Orkla India Limited ORKLAINDIA	₹8,157 Cr	26.1×	2.7×	18.8×	10.4%	11.4%	4.9%
Gujarat Ambuja Exports Limited GAEL	₹7,659 Cr	25.2×	2.3×	15.6×	9.2%	5.3%	5.3%

Peer comparison verdict

Manorama trades at a premium to peers (P/E 44.2× vs median 25.6×), but its higher ROE of 32.0% (sector 10.8%) justifies much of that premium — quality rarely comes cheap.

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

40% weight · 6 peers

Sector median PE25.6×

Fair value via PE₹1,080

20% weight · 7 peers

Sector median PB3.4×

Fair value via PB₹445

EV/EBITDA

40% weight · 5 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA15.6×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA₹993

Blended peer fair value₹918

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.