SEL Manufacturing Company — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer fair value could not be computed for SELMC. Insufficient peer ratio data.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Textiles industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Textiles · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
SEL Manufacturing Company SELMC · you	₹99 Cr	—	—	—	119.3%	-13.9%	—
Sector median	—	15.1×	1.6×	8.4×	6.7%	1.9%	41.3%
RSWM Limited RSWM	₹933 Cr	15.1×	0.7×	—	4.8%	0.0%	—
Pashupati Cotspin Limited PASHUPATI	₹865 Cr	1276.2×	8.1×	33.1×	6.3%	1.5%	15.8%
Mafatlal Industries Limited MAFATIND	₹859 Cr	10.2×	1.2×	8.4×	11.7%	2.3%	41.3%
Borana Weaves Limited BORANA	₹845 Cr	13.1×	3.0×	9.8×	22.9%	16.6%	42.1%
Sarla Performance Fibers Limited SARLAPOLY	₹804 Cr	22.7×	1.6×	—	7.0%	0.3%	—
Rajapalayam Mills Limited RAJPALAYAM	₹770 Cr	-437.3×	1.7×	—	-0.4%	0.0%	—
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited JISLDVREQS	₹732 Cr	33.6×	7.7×	0.3×	22.3%	3.6%	46.0%
Himatsingka Seide Limited HIMATSEIDE	₹702 Cr	15.0×	0.4×	3.6×	2.9%	2.5%	-2.1%

Peer comparison verdict

SEL is fairly valued relative to sector peers — trading near the sector median on key multiples (P/E ~15.1×, EV/EBITDA ~8.4×). Focus on execution quality and earnings trajectory from here.

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.