Shah Foods Ltd — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer fair value could not be computed for SHAHFOOD. Insufficient peer ratio data.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Fast Moving Consumer Goods industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Fast Moving Consumer Goods · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Shah Foods Ltd SHAHFOOD · you	₹816 Cr	-5000.0×	-1129.0×	—	21.4%	—	—
Sector median	—	29.4×	2.4×	13.4×	16.1%	2.5%	17.8%
Gokul Agro Resources Limited GOKULAGRO	₹6,482 Cr	18.8×	2.4×	9.0×	26.0%	1.5%	30.9%
Piccadily Agro Industries Limited PICCADIL	₹6,141 Cr	46.5×	7.2×	26.2×	15.3%	12.1%	21.3%
Triveni Engineering & Industries Limited TRIVENI	₹5,866 Cr	20.2×	2.0×	—	10.1%	-0.0%	—
Vadilal Industries Limited VADILALIND	₹5,562 Cr	36.8×	11.9×	—	32.3%	0.2%	—
Kaveri Seed Company Limited KSCL	₹4,965 Cr	13.6×	2.3×	13.4×	16.8%	21.2%	9.2%
Bannari Amman Sugars Limited BANARISUG	₹4,913 Cr	29.4×	2.3×	23.5×	7.7%	7.7%	-8.8%
Shree Renuka Sugars Limited RENUKA	₹4,672 Cr	-6.7×	-18.3×	—	272.9%	-0.1%	—
Hindustan Foods Limited HNDFDS	₹4,283 Cr	52.1×	6.6×	13.3×	12.8%	3.5%	17.8%

Peer comparison verdict

Shah looks attractively valued — trading at a discount to sector peers on P/E (-5000.0× vs sector median 29.4×) while delivering above-average returns on equity (21.4% vs 16.1%).

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.