RNIT AI SOLUTIONS LIMITED — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same IT services & consulting industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

IT services & consulting · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
RNIT AI SOLUTIONS LIMITED RNITAI · you	₹646 Cr	51.8×	126.9×	—	245.9%	0.2%	—
Sector median	—	33.4×	4.1×	25.5×	11.9%	10.4%	28.9%
Datamatics Global Services Limited DATAMATICS	₹4,664 Cr	22.9×	2.9×	15.7×	12.6%	9.8%	10.8%
Mastek Limited MASTEK	₹4,620 Cr	14.1×	1.9×	7.0×	13.5%	10.9%	13.0%
C.E. Info Systems MAPMYINDIA	₹4,481 Cr	33.4×	5.0×	25.5×	14.8%	28.3%	19.0%
eMudhra Limited EMUDHRA	₹4,371 Cr	40.5×	4.8×	26.6×	11.8%	15.4%	41.3%
Capillary Technologies India Limited CAPILLARY	₹3,977 Cr	77.3×	4.1×	30.0×	5.1%	7.1%	42.2%
TechNVision Ventures Limited TECHNVISN	₹3,352 Cr	3297.3×	200.7×	—	6.1%	0.1%	—
Aurionpro Solutions Limited AURIONPRO	₹3,347 Cr	19.1×	2.3×	10.5×	12.1%	14.8%	28.9%
Moschip Technologies Limited MOSCHIP	₹3,231 Cr	120.3×	10.0×	57.1×	8.6%	6.0%	43.4%

Peer comparison verdict

RNIT trades at a premium to peers (P/E 51.8× vs median 33.4×), but its higher ROE of 245.9% (sector 11.9%) justifies much of that premium — quality rarely comes cheap.

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

50% weight · 6 peers

Sector median PE28.2×

Fair value via PE₹41

20% weight · 7 peers

Sector median PB4.1×

Fair value via PB₹2

EV/EBITDA

30% weight · 7 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA25.5×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA—

Blended peer fair value₹30

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.