Suraj Estate Developers — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Real estate development industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Real estate development · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Suraj Estate Developers SURAJEST · you	₹994 Cr	13.4×	1.7×	—	12.7%	0.2%	—
Sector median	—	33.9×	2.6×	12.9×	4.8%	3.8%	23.9%
Max Estates Limited MAXESTATES	₹7,929 Cr	569.5×	3.0×	—	0.5%	6.3%	22.9%
Sri Lotus Developers and Realty Limited LOTUSDEV	₹7,695 Cr	34.5×	4.5×	23.5×	12.4%	30.8%	66.4%
Mahindra Lifespace Developers Limited MAHLIFE	₹6,164 Cr	26.3×	2.3×	—	8.2%	25.3%	24.8%
VALOR ESTATE LIMITED DBREALTY	₹6,078 Cr	84.3×	1.1×	—	1.3%	—	—
Puravankara Limited PURVA	₹5,194 Cr	33.2×	3.1×	—	9.5%	0.0%	—
Keystone Realtors Limited RUSTOMJEE	₹4,690 Cr	139.2×	1.9×	—	1.4%	0.1%	—
Sunteck Realty Limited SUNTECK	₹4,397 Cr	258.1×	2.0×	—	0.8%	0.3%	—
Kalpataru Limited KALPATARU	₹4,244 Cr	22.4×	3.0×	2.3×	13.4%	3.8%	18.4%

Peer comparison verdict

Suraj looks attractively valued — trading at a discount to sector peers on P/E (13.4× vs sector median 33.9×) while delivering above-average returns on equity (12.7% vs 4.8%).

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

20% weight · 6 peers

Sector median PE33.9×

Fair value via PE₹529

50% weight · 8 peers

Sector median PB2.6×

Fair value via PB₹322

EV/EBITDA

30% weight · 2 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA12.9×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA—

Blended peer fair value₹381

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.