Back to Texmaco Infrastructure & Holdings

Texmaco Infrastructure & Holdings — Peer Comparison

How the peer fair value is calculated and which companies were used as benchmarks.

Peer selection

Peers are selected from the same Services industry. 8 companies were matched as valid comparables.

Same-industry peers share similar business models, cost structures, and growth prospects — making them the most appropriate benchmarks for valuation multiples.

Peer comparison table

Services · 8 peers · sector medians shown

Better than medianWorse than median

Company	Mkt Cap	P/E	P/B	EV/EBITDA	ROE	Net Margin	Rev CAGR 3y
Texmaco Infrastructure & Holdings TEXINFRA · you	₹1,435 Cr	178.8×	0.8×	—	0.5%	0.5%	—
Sector median	—	60.9×	11.7×	15.4×	13.8%	0.6%	13.9%
BLACKBUCK LIMITED BLACKBUCK	₹10,391 Cr	60.9×	26.0×	—	42.8%	0.2%	—
WeWork India Management Limited WEWORK	₹9,809 Cr	119.4×	—	—	—	-0.0%	—
Nesco Limited NESCO	₹7,391 Cr	17.8×	2.5×	14.8×	13.8%	44.3%	19.5%
Indiabulls Limited IBULLSLTD	₹6,299 Cr	-475.8×	-117.6×	—	24.9%	—	—
Knowledge Marine & Engineering Works Limited KMEW	₹6,256 Cr	78.5×	11.6×	65.0×	13.8%	30.7%	8.3%
Smartworks Coworking Spaces Limited SMARTWORKS	₹6,147 Cr	579.5×	11.8×	5.2×	2.0%	0.6%	36.2%
Nirlon Limited NIRLON	₹5,790 Cr	20.5×	12.1×	16.0×	73.8%	51.7%	5.3%
TVS Supply Chain Solutions Limited TVSSCS	₹5,444 Cr	220.4×	2.1×	—	0.9%	0.0%	—

Peer comparison verdict

Texmaco trades at a premium to sector peers on P/E (178.8× vs median 60.9×). The market is pricing in higher growth — worth verifying whether recent revenue trends support that expectation.

How the peer fair value is calculated

Three valuation methods are weighted by sector. Each gives a fair value based on how sector peers are currently priced.

Method breakdown

35% weight · 5 peers

Sector median PE60.9×

Fair value via PE₹39

25% weight · 6 peers

Sector median PB11.7×

Fair value via PB₹1,695

EV/EBITDA

40% weight · 4 peers

Sector median EV/EBITDA15.4×

Fair value via EV/EBITDA—

Blended peer fair value₹729

Why median? Why these weights?

Median over mean: The sector median is used instead of the average because valuation multiples have extreme outliers — one high-growth company at 200× P/E would dramatically skew a mean. The median gives the middle value in the peer set, which better represents typical pricing.

Sector-specific weights: The weight given to each method reflects what matters most in this sector. For banks, P/B dominates because their value is tied to book assets. For IT companies, P/E carries the most weight because earnings quality matters more than asset base. For capital-intensive businesses, EV/EBITDA accounts for varying debt levels across peers and removes financing structure bias.

Limitations of peer comparison

Peer comparison assumes comparable companies are truly comparable — which is never perfectly true. Sector classifications can be imperfect: a conglomerate classified as "IT" may also have significant manufacturing revenue. Small peer counts (below 5) reduce confidence, as a single outlier can skew the sector median. When the entire sector is broadly expensive, peer comparison will show even an expensive stock as "fairly valued" relative to its peers.

The peer fair value shown is an algorithmic estimate based on publicly available financial data. It is not investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Please consult a SEBI-registered investment adviser before making any investment decision.